Section 13: Terms of office and conditions of service of Central Information Commission

Right to Information Act, 2005 • Official Statutory Text & Practice Guide

Statutory Regulation
Legal Standard
Competent Court / Tribunal
Act 2005
Statutory Defined Terms in this Section: (Click any term for official legal definition)

Legal Commentary & Landmark Judgments: Section 13

Section 13 regulates the term of office, conditions of service, salaries, and allowances of the Chief Information Commissioner and Information Commissioners, substantially restructured by the Right to Information (Amendment) Act, 2019 to replace statutory tenure and salary parity with executive rule-making discretion.

  • Pre-2019 Fixed Statutory Tenure vs. Post-2019 Executive Determination: Historically, Section 13(1) and 13(2) prescribed a fixed statutory tenure of five years or until attaining the age of 65 years. The RTI (Amendment) Act, 2019 (Act 24 of 2019) substituted this with 'for such term as may be prescribed by the Central Government', capped at 65 years, while maintaining the bar against reappointment.
  • Salary Structure and De-linking from Election Commission: Prior to 2019, Section 13(5) conferred statutory salary parity for the CIC with the Chief Election Commissioner, and for ICs with Election Commissioners (equivalent to Supreme Court Judges). The 2019 Amendment deleted this parity, empowering the Central Government to prescribe salaries, allowances, and service terms under the RTI Rules, 2019 (fixing Rs. 2,50,000 for CIC and Rs. 2,25,000 for ICs).
  • Pension Set-Off and Non-Diminution Protection: Section 13(3) provisos mandate that pensions received for prior government or judicial service must be deducted from the salary payable under the Act; Section 13(5) contains a protective non-diminution proviso ensuring that conditions of service shall not be varied to the disadvantage of an incumbent Commissioner after appointment.
Key Landmark Precedents:
  • Jairam Ramesh v. Union of India (W.P. (C) No. 1470 of 2019 - pending before Supreme Court): Direct constitutional challenge to the 2019 Amendment to Section 13, asserting that delegating tenure and salary conditions to central executive discretion subverts the institutional autonomy and quasi-judicial independence of the Information Commission.
  • Namit Sharma v. Union of India (2013) 1 SCC 745 & Union of India v. Namit Sharma (2013) 10 SCC 359: The Supreme Court recognized that statutory security of tenure and unalterable salary conditions are indispensable constitutional safeguards required to preserve the adjudicatory impartiality of Information Commissions against executive retribution.
  • Rojer Mathew v. South Indian Bank Ltd. (2020) 6 SCC 1: The Constitution Bench held that executive control over the appointment, tenure, and conditions of service of tribunal members violates the doctrine of separation of powers and judicial independence.
Courtroom Practice & Strategic Litigation Guidance:

In service litigation or auditing of Commissioner remuneration, ensure compliance with Section 13(3) pension deduction provisos to avoid recovery actions. In constitutional litigations, rely on the non-diminution proviso of Section 13(5) to challenge any executive attempt to curtail salaries, medical allowances, or perks of sitting Commissioners during their term.