Section 55: Vacancies, etc., not to invalidate proceeding of Appellate Tribunal

Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 • Official Statutory Text & Practice Guide

Statutory Regulation
Legal Standard
Competent Court / Tribunal
Act 2016

Legal Commentary & Landmark Judgments: Section 55

Section 55 provides statutory immunity to the orders and proceedings of the Appellate Tribunal, ensuring they cannot be invalidated merely due to vacancies or appointment defects.

  • Defect Immunity: No act or proceeding of REAT shall be invalid merely by reason of: (a) any vacancy or defect in constitution, (b) defect in appointment of Member, or (c) any irregularity not affecting merits.
  • De Facto Judicial Validity: Codifies the de facto doctrine for appellate adjudications, shielding rendered judgments from collateral technical invalidation.
  • Preservation of Litigant Rights: Ensures that years of appellate adjudication are not wiped out due to retrospective findings on administrative appointment files.
Key Landmark Precedents:
  • Gokaraju Rangaraju v. State of A.P., (1981) 3 SCC 132: The Supreme Court authoritatively held that the acts of a de facto judge performed under color of authority are valid and binding upon third parties.
  • Pushpa Devi v. REAT, 2020 SCC OnLine P&H 890: The Punjab & Haryana High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging a REAT final order on the ground of an administrative delay in gazetting a member's appointment, citing Section 55.
Courtroom Practice & Strategic Litigation Guidance:

Appellate challenges must focus strictly on substantive legal errors and jurisdictional excess under Section 58 rather than administrative composition technicalities.