Section 46: Qualifications for appointment of Chairperson and Members

Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 • Official Statutory Text & Practice Guide

Statutory Regulation
Legal Standard
Competent Court / Tribunal
Act 2016

Legal Commentary & Landmark Judgments: Section 46

Section 46 establishes the rigorous statutory qualifications for the appointment of the Chairperson and Members of the Real Estate Appellate Tribunal (REAT), requiring high-level judicial experience for the Chairperson and balanced judicial and administrative/technical expertise for its Members.

  • Chairperson Qualification: Person who is, or has been, a Judge of a High Court, appointed by the Appropriate Government in consultation with the Chief Justice of the High Court.
  • Judicial Member Qualification: Person who has held a judicial office for at least 15 years, or has been an advocate for at least 20 years with demonstrable experience in civil, commercial, or real estate law.
  • Technical or Administrative Member Qualification: Person having held the post of Additional Secretary to the Government of India or equivalent state post, with at least 20 years experience in urban development, housing, or real estate finance.
  • Selection Committee Mandate: Members appointed on the recommendation of a Selection Committee headed by the Chief Justice of the High Court or his nominee.
Key Landmark Precedents:
  • Madras Bar Association v. Union of India, (2021) 7 SCC 369: The Supreme Court ruled that appellate tribunals exercising judicial review over regulatory authorities must be headed by a former High Court Judge and maintain parity with constitutional courts in judicial membership.
  • Union of India v. R. Gandhi, (2010) 11 SCC 1: Affirmed that judicial functions cannot be handed over entirely to civil servants; judicial members are essential to maintain constitutional adjudication standards.
Courtroom Practice & Strategic Litigation Guidance:

In appellate proceedings before REAT, ensure that the coram is properly constituted with a judicial member presiding; an order delivered by an administrative member sitting singly is jurisdictionally vulnerable.