Section 39: Rectification of orders

Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 • Official Statutory Text & Practice Guide

Statutory Regulation
Legal Standard
Competent Court / Tribunal
Act 2016

Legal Commentary & Landmark Judgments: Section 39

Section 39 provides for the rectification of orders passed by the Regulatory Authority within a period of two years, strictly limited to correcting errors apparent on the face of the record.

  • Two-Year Limitation: Authority may amend any order passed by it within two years from the date of the order to rectify any error apparent on the face of the record.
  • Suo Motu or on Application: Rectification can be initiated suo motu or upon an application moved by any affected party.
  • Bar on Merits Review: Cannot make substantive amendments or alter findings on the merits of the dispute; review on merits is impermissible.
  • Adverse Amendments Notice: No amendment prejudicially affecting any party can be passed without providing a reasonable opportunity of being heard.
Key Landmark Precedents:
  • State of Haryana v. Babu Singh, (2008) 2 SCC 85: The Supreme Court held that the power of rectification is circumscribed to correcting patent clerical, arithmetic, or typographical errors and cannot be equated with appellate re-hearing.
  • Parsion Devi v. Sumitri Devi, (1997) 8 SCC 715: Settled that an error apparent on the face of the record must be self-evident and not require elaborate arguments or re-examination of contested evidence.
Courtroom Practice & Strategic Litigation Guidance:

Use Section 39 exclusively to correct calculation errors in interest amounts, typographical date mistakes, or incorrect flat numbers; do not file a Section 39 application to overturn an adverse legal finding—file an appeal before REAT under Section 44 instead.