Section 36: Power to make rules

Recovery of Debts and Bankruptcy Act, 1993 • Official Statutory Text & Practice Guide

Statutory Regulation
Legal Standard
Competent Court / Tribunal
Act 1993

Legal Commentary & Landmark Judgments: Section 36

Section 36 commands that every rule made by the Central Government under the Act shall be laid before each House of Parliament, establishing mandatory legislative oversight and scrutiny over subordinate legislation.

  • Mandatory Parliamentary Laying Requirement: Section 36 mandates that every rule made under the Act shall be laid, as soon as may be after it is made, before each House of Parliament while it is in session for a total period of thirty days.
  • Cumulative Period of Deliberation: The statutory thirty-day period may be comprised in one session or in two or more successive sessions, providing Parliament with adequate opportunity to examine executive rule-making.
  • Legislative Modification and Annulment Mechanism: If both Houses agree in making any modification in the rule, or agree that the rule should not be made, the rule shall thereafter have effect only in such modified form or be of no effect, without prejudice to the validity of anything previously done.
Key Landmark Precedents:
  • Atlas Cycle Industries Ltd. v. State of Haryana (1979) 2 SCC 196: The Supreme Court held that the requirement of laying statutory rules before Parliament serves as an essential constitutional check by the legislature over delegated executive authority, affirming the supremacy of parliamentary oversight.
  • Quarry Owners' Association v. State of Bihar (2000) 8 SCC 655: The Supreme Court ruled that parliamentary laying clauses ensure transparency and maintain legislative accountability over delegated subordinate legislation framed under primary statutes.
Courtroom Practice & Strategic Litigation Guidance:

In mounting an administrative law challenge against any new procedural or fee regulation issued by the Ministry of Finance, verify whether the rule was duly laid before Parliament under Section 36. An executive circular attempting to implement substantive rules without parliamentary tabling is susceptible to constitutional challenge for bypassing mandatory legislative oversight.