Section 28: Other modes of recovery

Recovery of Debts and Bankruptcy Act, 1993 • Official Statutory Text & Practice Guide

Statutory Regulation
Legal Standard
Competent Court / Tribunal
Act 1993

Legal Commentary & Landmark Judgments: Section 28

Section 28 equips the Recovery Officer with extraordinary and expansive alternative modes of recovery, authorizing salary attachment, garnishee proceedings against third-party debtors, joint account attachment, and distraint of movable properties.

  • Cumulative and Alternative Recovery Modes: Sub-section (1) provides that the Recovery Officer may recover the certified debt by any one or more of the modes provided in Section 28, concurrently with or independently of the modes specified in Section 25.
  • Salary Attachment Mandate: Sub-section (2) empowers the Recovery Officer to require the employer of the defendant to deduct from the debtor's salary specified amounts and pay them directly to the Recovery Officer.
  • Garnishee Powers Against Third-Party Debtors: Sub-section (3) authorizes the Recovery Officer to serve a garnishee notice upon any person from whom money is due or may become due to the defendant, or who holds money for or on account of the defendant, compelling direct payment to satisfy the debt.
  • Joint Account Presumption and Personal Liability: Sub-section (3)(ii) enacts a presumption that joint account funds belong equally to the account holders unless rebutted; sub-section (3)(iv) provides that failure by a garnishee to pay after notice renders him personally liable as a deemed defaulter.
Key Landmark Precedents:
  • Allahabad Bank v. Canara Bank (2000) 4 SCC 406: The Supreme Court held that the garnishee and coercive powers under Section 28 are wide, exclusive, and operate without requiring the leave of the company court under Section 446 of the Companies Act, 1956.
  • Central Bank of India v. State of Kerala (2009) 4 SCC 94: The Supreme Court recognized that Section 28 provides an expansive machinery for third-party debt recovery, though statutory first charges created by state tax statutes prior to 2016 amendments were held to take precedence over ordinary unsecured claims.
  • Transcore v. Union of India (2008) 1 SCC 125: The Supreme Court observed that the multifaceted recovery modes under Section 28 reinforce the legislative objective of preventing institutional funds from remaining locked up in prolonged litigation.
Courtroom Practice & Strategic Litigation Guidance:

To intercept funds before they are siphoned, bank counsel should immediately file an application under Section 28(3) seeking a Garnishee Order against the borrower's trade debtors, tenant rent receivables, and secondary bank accounts. Once a Section 28(3) notice is served on a third-party garnishee, any subsequent payment by the garnishee to the borrower is void as against the Recovery Officer, and the garnishee becomes personally liable to the extent of the certified debt.