Section 2: Definitions

Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013 • Official Statutory Text & Practice Guide

Statutory Regulation
Legal Standard
Competent Court / Tribunal
Act 2013
Statutory Definitions in POSH Act Section 2: (Click any term for official legal definition)

Legal Commentary & Landmark Judgments: Section 2

Section 2 establishes the foundational statutory definitions under the POSH Act, creating broad, protective definitions for 'aggrieved woman', 'employee', 'employer', and 'workplace'.

  • Core Legal Standard: Under clause (a), an 'aggrieved woman' means any woman of any age, whether employed or not, who alleges to have been subjected to sexual harassment in a workplace, extending protection to visiting clients, interns, and third-party vendors.
  • Operational Mechanism: Clause (f) provides an extraordinarily wide definition of 'employee' covering regular, temporary, ad-hoc, daily wage, contractual employees, probationers, trainees, apprentices, and volunteers, whether working with or without remuneration.

Clause (o) articulates the 'notional extension of workplace' doctrine, encompassing any department, establishment, enterprise, institution, sports institute, dwelling place or house, and crucially, any place visited by the employee arising out of or during the course of employment, including transportation provided by the employer or virtual communication channels.

Key Landmark Precedents:
  • Aureliano Fernandes v. State of Goa (2023) 17 SCC 513: Emphasized that definitions under Section 2 must be interpreted expansively to foster a dignified work environment, ruling that academic institutions and autonomous bodies are strictly bound by the Act.
  • Sanjay Kumar v. Union of India (2021) SCC OnLine Del 4774: Affirmed that digital spaces, email communications, and social media interactions between co-workers fall squarely within the extended definition of 'workplace' under Section 2(o).
Legal Commentary:

Section 2 strips organizations of conventional contractual defenses. The employer cannot shield itself by claiming the complainant was an unpaid intern or contractor, nor can an accused escape liability because misconduct took place over WhatsApp or during an off-site corporate dinner.