Section 88: Acceptor or endorser bound notwithstanding previous alteration

Negotiable Instruments Act • Official Statutory Text & Practice Guide

Statutory Regulation
Legal Standard
Competent Court / Tribunal
Act 1881

Legal Commentary & Landmark Judgments: Section 88

Section 88 provides an exception to Section 87, enacting that an acceptor or indorser is bound by their acceptance or indorsement notwithstanding any previous material alteration.

  • Estoppel Against Subsequent Parties: A person who accepts or indorses an instrument AFTER it has been altered is legally bound by the instrument in its altered state.
  • Warranty of Genuineness: By signing, the subsequent party warrants that the instrument as seen and signed by them is a valid, enforceable obligation.
  • Protection for Subsequent Holders: Prevents subsequent signers from using earlier alterations to defeat the claims of holders in due course.
Key Landmark Precedents:
  • Master v. Miller (1791) 4 TR 320: The foundational authority on alteration, establishing that subsequent indorsers who adopt the paper are estopped from disputing prior changes.
  • Seth Loon Karan Sethiya v. Ivan E. John (1977) 1 SCC 379: Discussed the statutory boundary between voidness under Section 87 and subsequent party liability under Section 88.
Courtroom Practice & Strategic Litigation Guidance:

If representing a holder suing an indorser who claims 'the date was altered before I received it', invoke Section 88. An indorser who indorsed the paper in its altered state is strictly bound to subsequent holders.