Section 27: Agency

Negotiable Instruments Act • Official Statutory Text & Practice Guide

Statutory Regulation
Legal Standard
Competent Court / Tribunal
Act 1881

Legal Commentary & Landmark Judgments: Section 27

Section 27 governs agency in negotiable instruments, enacting that a general authority to transact business does not empower an agent to draw, accept, or indorse bills on behalf of the principal.

  • Strict Construction of Authority: Authority to sign negotiable paper must be expressly conferred; a general power of attorney to manage property or business does not include power to issue notes.
  • Binding the Principal: An agent acting within explicit authority binds the principal as if the principal had personally signed.
  • Prohibition of Implied Expansion: Authority to draw does not imply authority to indorse; authority to accept does not imply authority to borrow on bills.
Key Landmark Precedents:
  • Sankaralingam Chettiar v. Veluchami Pillai (AIR 1943 Mad 43): The Full Bench laid down that agency under Section 27 must be strictly construed; authority to manage properties does not empower an agent to execute promissory notes binding the principal.
  • Syndicate Bank v. R.V. Transport: Affirmed that banks discounting instruments signed by alleged attorneys must verify express negotiable borrowing clauses in the power of attorney.
Courtroom Practice & Strategic Litigation Guidance:

When accepting a promissory note or cheque signed by an attorney or manager, ensure the power of attorney explicitly contains the phrase: 'to draw, accept, sign, indorse, and negotiate bills of exchange and promissory notes'. Standard general power of attorney clauses will not suffice in court.