Section 124: Cheque crossed specially

Negotiable Instruments Act • Official Statutory Text & Practice Guide

Statutory Regulation
Legal Standard
Competent Court / Tribunal
Act 1881

Legal Commentary & Landmark Judgments: Section 124

Section 124 defines a 'cheque crossed specially', enacting that where a cheque bears across its face an addition of the name of a banker, with or without the words 'not negotiable', it is crossed specially to that banker.

  • Addition of Specified Banker's Name: The name of a specific banking institution must be written across the face of the cheque; parallel lines are customary but not strictly compulsory.
  • Exclusive Payment Mandate: Under Section 126, the paying banker must pay the cheque ONLY to the banker to whom it is crossed, or their agent for collection.
  • Highest Security Standard: Restricts clearing strictly to the designated bank, providing maximum protection against fraud.
Key Landmark Precedents:
  • Kerala State Co-operative Marketing Federation v. State Bank of India (2004) 2 SCC 425: The Supreme Court analyzed special crossings under Section 124, holding that banks must adhere strictly to special crossing instructions or bear full liability for conversion.
  • Ogden v. Benas (1874) LR 9 CP 513: Affirmed that paying a specially crossed cheque to any bank other than the designated bank is negligence as a matter of law.
Courtroom Practice & Strategic Litigation Guidance:

For high-value commercial settlements or court deposit refunds, always cross the cheque specially: 'State Bank of India, High Court Branch'. This ensures the cheque cannot be deposited into any other bank account anywhere in India.