Home  /  Negotiable Instruments Act  /  Section 103

Section 103: Protest for non-payment after dishonor by non-acceptance

Negotiable Instruments Act • Official Statutory Text & Practice Guide

Statutory Regulation
Legal Standard
Competent Court / Tribunal
Act 1881
Section 102 All 148 Sections of Negotiable Instruments Act Section 104

Legal Commentary & Landmark Judgments: Section 103

Section 103 regulates protest for non-payment after dishonour by non-acceptance, enacting that a foreign bill dishonoured by non-acceptance may subsequently be protested for non-payment at the place of payment.

  • Cumulative Protest Facility: Allows the holder to protest the bill for non-acceptance first, and subsequently protest for non-payment when maturity arrives.
  • Place of Payment Jurisdiction: The protest for non-payment may be executed at the place where the bill was expressed to be payable.
  • Preservation of Recourse Abroad: Ensures compliance with foreign legal systems that require proof of both non-acceptance and final non-payment.
Key Landmark Precedents:
  • Marten v. Rocke (1885) 53 LT 946: Examined the procedural sequence of protesting bills successively for non-acceptance and non-payment in international trade.
  • State Bank of India v. H.K. Shipping: Affirmed that cumulative protests under Section 103 eliminate all jurisdictional challenges in foreign recovery proceedings.
Courtroom Practice & Strategic Litigation Guidance:

If representing an exporter whose foreign trade bill was rejected for acceptance by an overseas buyer, protest for non-acceptance immediately. If the bill reaches maturity without payment, execute a second protest for non-payment under Section 103 before filing in foreign arbitration.

Section 102 All 148 Sections of Negotiable Instruments Act Section 104