Home  /  Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985  /  Section 82

Section 82: Repeal and savings

Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 • Official Statutory Text & Practice Guide

Statutory Regulation
Legal Standard
Competent Court / Tribunal
Act 1985
Section 81 All 83 Sections of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 Section 83

Legal Commentary & Landmark Judgments: Section 82

Section 82 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 expressly repealed the three principal colonial-era statutes that had governed narcotics administration in British India—the Opium Act, 1857 (Act 13 of 1857), the Opium Act, 1878 (Act 1 of 1878), and the Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930 (Act 2 of 1930)—consolidating the fragmented legal regime into a singular, comprehensive national enactment. Incorporating standard legislative savings principles, Section 82 preserves the validity of actions taken, licenses issued, rules framed, and pending proceedings initiated under the repealed statutes, ensuring an unbroken continuity of legal administration and enforcement across the historic statutory transition.

  • Express Repeal of Colonial Enactments: Under Section 82(1), the Act explicitly repealed: (a) The Opium Act, 1857; (b) The Opium Act, 1878; and (c) The Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930. This dismantled the nineteenth-century colonial revenue-farming and colonial state monopoly framework in favor of a modern, comprehensive prohibition and regulatory enactment.
  • Statutory Savings and Institutional Continuity: Pursuant to Section 82(2), notwithstanding such repeal, anything done or any action taken or purported to have been done or taken under any repealed law shall, in so far as it is not inconsistent with the provisions of the NDPS Act, be deemed to have been done or taken under the corresponding provisions of the NDPS Act.
  • Application of Section 6 of the General Clauses Act, 1897: The savings clause in Section 82 operates in conjunction with Section 6 of the General Clauses Act, 1897. Any investigation, legal proceeding, or remedy in respect of any right, privilege, obligation, liability, penalty, forfeiture, or punishment accrued or incurred under the repealed enactments continued unaffected.
Key Landmark Precedents:
  • State of Punjab v. Mohinder Singh (2005) 12 SCC 344: The Supreme Court held that offences committed prior to the commencement of the NDPS Act, 1985 remain punishable under the repealed Opium Act or Dangerous Drugs Act by virtue of Section 82 savings and Section 6 of the General Clauses Act, 1897.
  • Kolhapur Canesugar Mills Ltd. v. Union of India (2000) 2 SCC 536 (Constitution Bench): The Constitution Bench settled the operational contours of repeal and savings clauses, confirming that saving provisions ensure that past actions and liabilities do not vanish into a legal vacuum.
Courtroom Practice & Strategic Litigation Guidance:

In historical cases involving long-pending trials, legacy land forfeitures, or heirloom opium possession originating prior to November 1985: Verify whether the alleged act occurred before the commencement of the NDPS Act. If the act predates the NDPS Act, the accused cannot be subjected to the enhanced minimum sentences of the NDPS Act (such as 10-20 years imprisonment under Section 18), as doing so would violate the ex post facto penal prohibition under Article 20(1) of the Constitution; the offence must be tried and sentenced under the repealed 1878 Act.

Section 81 All 83 Sections of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 Section 83