Home  /  Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985  /  Section 78

Section 78: Power of State Government to make rules

Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 • Official Statutory Text & Practice Guide

Statutory Regulation
Legal Standard
Competent Court / Tribunal
Act 1985
Section 77 All 83 Sections of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 Section 79

Legal Commentary & Landmark Judgments: Section 78

Section 78 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 confers delegated rule-making authority upon State Governments to regulate localized aspects of narcotics and psychotropic substances administration falling within their territorial jurisdiction. Authorizing State Governments to frame rules regarding the possession, transport, purchase, sale, and consumption of cannabis (bhang), manufactured drugs, opium poppy straw, and the licensing of state warehouses, Section 78 enables states to balance federal narcotics prohibition with traditional cultural practices and state excise revenue administration.

  • State Rule-Making Competence: Under Section 78(1), the State Government may, by notification in the Official Gazette, make rules for carrying out the purposes of the Act in respect of matters not falling within the exclusive domain of the Central Government. State rules must be published and notified in the State Gazette.
  • Enumerated State Regulatory Heads: Section 78(2) specifies key regulatory subjects for state rules, including: (a) regulating the possession, transport, purchase, and sale of cannabis plants and resin; (b) regulating the custody, warehousing, and transit of manufactured drugs within the state; (c) establishing and regulating detoxification centers under Section 71; and (d) prescribing fees and conditions for state excise licenses.
  • State Legislative Oversight and Laying Requirement: Section 78(3) mandates that every rule made by the State Government under this section shall be laid, as soon as may be after it is made, before the State Legislature, ensuring state democratic oversight over delegated excise regulations.
Key Landmark Precedents:
  • Arjun Singh v. State of Haryana AIR 2004 P&H 257: The Punjab and Haryana High Court held that the cultivation, possession, and sale of bhang (cannabis leaves) is governed by State Government rules under Section 78 and state excise laws, as the NDPS Act definition of cannabis under Section 2(iii) excludes cannabis leaves and seeds when not accompanied by flowering tops.
  • State of Punjab v. Baldev Singh (1999) 6 SCC 172 (Constitution Bench): The Supreme Court affirmed that while States have rule-making authority under Section 78, State rules cannot dilute, modify, or override the mandatory search and arrest safeguards enacted by Parliament under the NDPS Act.
Courtroom Practice & Strategic Litigation Guidance:

In prosecutions involving 'bhang' or cannabis leaves, examine whether the recovery consists exclusively of leaves without flowering tops. If so, invoke Section 2(iii) read with the relevant State Rules framed under Section 78 (e.g., State Excise Rules) to argue that possession of bhang is not an offence under the NDPS Act. Move for quashing under Section 482 CrPC / Section 528 BNSS or discharge, establishing that prosecution under the NDPS Act is misconceived.

Section 77 All 83 Sections of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 Section 79