Section 71: Power of Government to establish centers for identification, treatment, etc., of addicts and for supply of narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances

Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 • Official Statutory Text & Practice Guide

Statutory Regulation
Legal Standard
Competent Court / Tribunal
Act 1985

Legal Commentary & Landmark Judgments: Section 71

Section 71 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 empowers the Central Government or State Government to establish, fund, and regulate specialized centers for the identification, treatment, detoxification, and social reintegration of drug-dependent persons, and to regulate the supply of narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances for medical detox and de-addiction therapy. Representing the vital public-health and harm-reduction dimension of the NDPS Act, Section 71 balances punitive suppression with medical rehabilitation, creating the statutory architecture for Opioid Substitution Therapy (OST) and community reintegration.

  • Establishment of Identification and Treatment Centers: Under Section 71(1), the Government may establish and maintain as many centers as it thinks fit for the identification, treatment, education, after-care, rehabilitation, and social reintegration of addicts. This creates a statutory foundation for state-funded and NGO-partnered de-addiction facilities across the country.
  • Controlled Medical Supply for De-Addiction: Section 71(1) further authorizes the Government to make rules for the supply, by such centers, of narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances to addicts where such supply is a medically recognized necessity for detoxification or maintenance therapy (such as buprenorphine or methadone protocols in OST programs).
  • Regulatory Oversight and Quality Control: Section 71(2) empowers the Government to frame rules regulating the standards, staffing, medical protocols, and licensing of such centers. This regulatory power is designed to eliminate abusive, unauthorized, or torture-ridden private rehabilitation camps, ensuring that de-addiction aligns with psychiatric and medical standards.
Key Landmark Precedents:
  • Indian Harm Reduction Network v. Union of India 2011 SCC OnLine Del 4376: The Delhi High Court emphasized that the right to health under Article 21 includes access to evidence-based harm reduction and de-addiction treatment; Section 71 mandates that the State must provide adequate medical infrastructure for drug-dependent persons.
  • Social Action Forum for Manav Adhikar v. Union of India (2018) 10 SCC 443: The Supreme Court recognized that drug dependency is a medical and public health issue requiring compassionate therapeutic intervention under statutory schemes like Section 71 rather than purely penal retribution.
Courtroom Practice & Strategic Litigation Guidance:

For defense counsel representing an accused charged with small or intermediate quantity consumption or possession under Section 27, combine Section 71 with Section 39 or Section 64A (immunity to addicts volunteering for treatment). Move the trial court to divert the accused into a certified Section 71 de-addiction center rather than jail custody. If a private de-addiction center is running an unregulated facility, challenge its operations under Section 71(2) rules and constitutional writ petitions.