(1) Any person empowered under section 42 or section 43 or section 44 who—
(a) without reasonable ground of suspicion enters or searches, or causes to be entered or searched, any building, conveyance or place;
(b) vexatiously and unnecessarily seizes the property of any person on the pretence of seizing or searching for any narcotic drug or psychotropic substance or other article liable to be confiscated under this Act, or of seizing any document or other article liable to be seized under section 42, section 43 or section 44; or
(c) vexatiously and unnecessarily detains, searches or arrests any person,
shall be punishable with imprisonment for a term which may extend to six months or with fine which may extend to one thousand rupees, or with both.
(2) Any person wilfully and maliciously giving false information and so causing an arrest or a search being made under this Act shall be punishable with imprisonment for a term which may extend to two years or with fine or with both.
Legal Commentary & Landmark Judgments: Section 58
Section 58 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 provides an indispensable statutory check against the arbitrary abuse of extraordinary search, seizure, and arrest powers conferred upon enforcement personnel. It criminalizes vexatious executive action, prescribing imprisonment for up to six months, or fine up to one thousand rupees, or both, for any empowered officer who, without reasonable grounds of suspicion, enters or searches any building, conveyance, or place, or vexatiously and unnecessarily seizes property or arrests any person. By penalizing mala fide enforcement, Section 58 enforces constitutional proportionality under Article 21 and balances the draconian presumptions of the NDPS Act with individual liberty guarantees.
When an accused is discharged or acquitted following an illegal raid where officers planted contraband or conducted searches without recording Section 42 information or without reasonable grounds, file a criminal complaint under Section 58 NDPS Act alongside proceedings under Section 166/220 IPC (Sections 199/257 BNS). Note that prosecution under Section 58 is subject to the sanction requirement under Section 59(3). However, establish that where the search was demonstrably malicious or fabricated, official good-faith immunity under Section 69 does not apply, opening avenues for constitutional tort compensation under Article 226/32.