Home  /  MSMED Act, 2006  /  Section 11

Section 11: Procurement preference policy

Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006 • Official Statutory Text & Practice Guide

MSME Law
3x Compound Interest
MSEFC Facilitation Council
Act 27 of 2006
Section 10 All 32 Sections of MSMED Act Section 12
Statutory Defined Terms in this Section: (Click any term for official legal definition)
Enterprise Sec 2 Supplier Sec 2

Legal Commentary & Landmark Judgments: Section 11

Section 11 empowers the Central Government to notify public procurement policies facilitating preferential purchase of goods produced and services rendered by micro and small enterprises by Central Ministries, Departments, and Public Sector Undertakings.

  • Public Procurement Policy Mandate: Enacted to guarantee market access for MSEs; operationalized via the Public Procurement Policy for MSEs Order, 2012 (as amended).
  • Mandatory 25% Procurement Quota: Central Ministries and CPSEs must procure a minimum of 25% of their total annual purchases from MSEs, including dedicated sub-targets (4% for SC/ST-owned MSEs and 3% for Women-owned MSEs).
  • Tender Concessions & Price Preference: Guarantees waiver of tender document fees, exemption from earnest money deposit (EMD), and price matching rights (L1 + 15% band allows MSEs to match L1 quote and obtain 25% of the tender order).
Key Landmark Precedents:
  • Patel Engineering Ltd. v. Union of India (2012) 11 SCC 1: The Supreme Court held that state tender conditions must strictly observe statutory procurement preferences enacted for affirmative economic action and protection of vulnerable industrial sectors.
  • Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. v. Tata Communications Ltd. (2014) 14 SCC 340: Affirmed that procurement guidelines formulated under statutory authority are mandatory on public utilities and government instrumentalities.
  • Silpi Industries v. Kerala State Road Transport Corpn. (2021) 18 SCC 790: Addressed the interplay between public procurement mandates, MSME registration, and commercial contracts entered into by state transport corporations.
Courtroom Practice & Strategic Litigation Guidance:

If a PSU or government department rejects an MSE bid for non-deposit of EMD or refuses to accord L1+15% price-matching preference, file an urgent writ petition under Article 226 challenging the tender evaluation as ultra vires Section 11 and the Public Procurement Policy Order, 2012.

Section 10 All 32 Sections of MSMED Act Section 12