Section 9: Grant of driving licence

Motor Vehicles Act • Official Statutory Text & Practice Guide

Statutory Regulation
Legal Standard
Competent Court / Tribunal
Act 1988

Legal Commentary & Landmark Judgments: Section 9

Section 9 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 establishes the statutory conditions, practical driving competency evaluations, automated testing protocols, biometric linkages, and licensing standards governing the formal grant of a permanent driving licence.

  • Practical Competence and Automated Driving Tests: Section 9(3) mandates that the applicant must satisfy the licensing authority of driving proficiency through an objective driving test conducted on a designated track or automated testing station, demonstrating vehicle control, lane discipline, incline halting, and emergency maneuvers.
  • Institutional Exemption via Accredited Driver Centres: Following the 2019 amendment, the proviso to Section 9(3) exempts candidates from the practical RTO driving test if they have successfully completed training and passed the exit evaluation at an accredited driver training centre recognized under Section 12.
  • Statutory Grounds of Refusal and Reasoned Orders: Under Section 9(5), the authority is empowered to refuse grant if the applicant has prior unexpired disqualifications, medical incapacities, or fails the driving test thrice; all refusal orders must be communicated in writing with specific recorded reasons.
Key Landmark Precedents:
  • Pappu v. Vinod Kumar Lamba (2018) 3 SCC 208: The Supreme Court reiterated that producing a valid driving licence issued under Section 9 is the primary burden of the vehicle owner/driver; once the insurer proves the licence was fake or non-existent, the owner must establish due diligence to avert final liability.
  • National Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Vidhyadhar Mahariwala (2008) 12 SCC 701: Held that the driver must possess an effective driving licence on the date of the accident; where a licence expired and was not renewed within the statutory grace period under Section 9/15, the insurer was entitled to recover the awarded sum from the insured.
  • Rishi Pal Singh v. New India Assurance Co. Ltd. (2022) 8 SCC 438: Affirmed that an owner is only required to verify the facial validity and competence of the driver at the time of employment; the owner is not expected to conduct an administrative inquiry at the RTO to verify the genuineness of a Section 9 licence.
Courtroom Practice & Strategic Litigation Guidance:

In MACT proceedings where the insurer alleges the licence was fake or never issued, do not rely on unverified private investigator reports. Summon the licensing clerk under Order XVI CPC along with the official Sarathi register. In the absence of an official RTO witness or certified register extract under Section 76 of the Evidence Act, an unproved allegation of an invalid Section 9 licence cannot exonerate the insurer.