Home  /  Motor Vehicles Act  /  Section 195

Section 195: Imposition of minimum fine under certain circumstances

Motor Vehicles Act • Official Statutory Text & Practice Guide

Statutory Regulation
Legal Standard
Competent Court / Tribunal
Act 1988
Section 194 All 217 Sections of Motor Vehicles Act Section 196

Legal Commentary & Landmark Judgments: Section 195

Section 195 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 historically regulated judicial sentencing discretion by prescribing mandatory minimum fines for repeat traffic and transport offences, prior to its formal repeal by the Motor Vehicles (Amendment) Act, 2019, which integrated statutory minimum penalties directly into individual substantive penal sections.

  • Statutory Floor on Fines for Repeat Offenders: Historically mandated that courts trying subsequent offences under the Act could not impose a fine of less than fifty per cent of the maximum fine prescribed for that specific offence, curtailing unbridled judicial leniency.
  • Repeal and Rationalization by Act 32 of 2019: Formally repealed by the Motor Vehicles (Amendment) Act, 2019 (s. 77 w.e.f. 1-9-2019), because the amended Act directly embedded strict, non-derogable minimum financial penalties into substantive sections such as Sections 182, 192, 193, 194, and 196.
  • Preservation of Judicial Principles on Mandatory Sentences: Preserves the foundational jurisprudence governing the limits of judicial discretion in imposing statutory minimum sentences and the impermissibility of reducing fines below statutory baselines without exceptional recorded grounds.
Key Landmark Precedents:
  • State of M.P. v. Vikram Das (2019) 4 SCC 125: The Supreme Court held that where a statute prescribes a mandatory minimum sentence or fine, courts have no discretion or inherent power to reduce the punishment below the statutory floor; leniency violating statutory minimums is legally unsustainable.
  • Union of India v. Dharamendra Textile Processors (2008) 13 SCC 369: A three-Judge Bench of the Supreme Court held that in civil and regulatory penalties enacted for strict enforcement, the statutory minimum penalty cannot be modified or waived on equitable grounds unless the statute expressly provides a saving proviso.
Courtroom Practice & Strategic Litigation Guidance:

In summary traffic challan proceedings, judicial magistrates have no statutory power to reduce the fine below the minimum prescribed baseline for amended offences (e.g., minimum ₹2,000 under Section 192 or ₹2,000 under Section 196). Counsel seeking relief must challenge the foundational charge or establish complete misidentification rather than pleading poverty for a sub-minimum fine.

Section 194 All 217 Sections of Motor Vehicles Act Section 196