Section 153: Settlement between insurers and insured persons

Motor Vehicles Act • Official Statutory Text & Practice Guide

Statutory Regulation
Legal Standard
Competent Court / Tribunal
Act 1988

Legal Commentary & Landmark Judgments: Section 153

Section 153 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 establishes a strict statutory bar against bilateral or private settlements between insurers and insured persons that prejudice or extinguish third-party claims, mandating that no compromise regarding third-party liability is legally valid unless the third-party victim or legal representatives are consenting parties thereto, subject to mandatory Claims Tribunal scrutiny.

  • Mandatory Third-Party Joinder in Settlements: Section 153(1) statutorily invalidates any compromise or settlement reached privately between an insurer and the insured vehicle owner regarding statutory third-party liabilities under Section 147(1)(b) unless the third party or claimant is an express party consenting to the terms of the settlement.
  • Tribunal Scrutiny for Bona Fides and Coercion: Section 153(2) casts an affirmative duty upon the Claims Tribunal to conduct an independent judicial enquiry to verify that any proposed settlement is entirely bona fide, unmarred by fraud, misrepresentation, or undue influence, and strictly conforms to the compensation schedules prescribed under Section 164.
  • Insolvency Protection and Preservation of Transferred Rights: Section 153(3) enacts an overriding non-obstante protection establishing that where the insured becomes insolvent or enters company winding-up, no subsequent agreement, waiver, assignment, release, or payment between insurer and insured can defeat or erode the statutory rights transferred to the third party.
Key Landmark Precedents:
  • K. Suresh v. New India Assurance Co. Ltd. (2012) 12 SCC 274: The Supreme Court held that in motor accident claims, the statutory duty of tribunals is to award just, fair, and reasonable compensation; insurers cannot circumvent statutory obligations through unfair settlements or rigid technical formulas, and tribunals must ensure full restitution for pecuniary and non-pecuniary losses under Chapter XI.
  • National Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Nicolletta Rohtagi (2002) 7 SCC 456: A three-Judge Bench of the Supreme Court held that the scheme of compulsory third-party insurance under Chapter XI is designed for the absolute social protection of accident victims; insurers cannot enter into side agreements or raise extra-statutory defences outside Section 149(2) to defeat third-party recoveries.
Courtroom Practice & Strategic Litigation Guidance:

In MACT Lok Adalats or pre-trial settlement negotiations, claimants' counsel must ensure that any joint memo of compromise is formally presented before the Tribunal under Section 153(2) with full verification of the victim's identity and banking particulars. For insurers, never execute bilateral discharge vouchers with the insured without impleading the victim, as such instruments are void against third parties and will be summarily rejected by the Tribunal.