Section 132: Duty of driver to stop in certain cases

Motor Vehicles Act • Official Statutory Text & Practice Guide

Statutory Regulation
Legal Standard
Competent Court / Tribunal
Act 1988

Legal Commentary & Landmark Judgments: Section 132

Section 132 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 commands motor vehicle drivers to stop and remain stationary (up to 24 hours) upon police demand, accident involvement causing injury or damage, or animal alarm, and to disclose driver and owner identity particulars to affected persons.

  • Mandatory Duty to Stop on Police Demand or Accident: Section 132(1) obligates the driver to immediately halt the vehicle when required by a Sub-Inspector (or above) in uniform, or whenever the vehicle is involved in an accident causing injury to any person, animal, or property.
  • Reciprocal Particulars Exchange Requirement: Mandates that the driver must disclose his name and address, as well as the name and address of the vehicle owner, to any person affected by the accident or damage, provided such affected person also furnishes their name and address.
  • Duty to Halt for Alarmed Livestock: Requires the driver to stop the vehicle when requested by any person in charge of an animal (horse, cattle, elephant, camel, mule, sheep, or goat) if such person apprehends the animal is becoming unmanageable.
Key Landmark Precedents:
  • State of Karnataka v. Muralidhar (2009) 4 SCC 663: The Supreme Court observed that the statutory command to stop and render information under Section 132 is fundamental to road traffic regulation and hit-and-run investigation; failure to halt after an accident provides strong corroborative evidence of reckless conduct.
  • State of Maharashtra v. Mayer Hans George AIR 1965 SC 722: The Supreme Court affirmed that regulatory statutory mandates designed to prevent injury and ensure identity disclosure in public administration carry strict compliance duties.
Courtroom Practice & Strategic Litigation Guidance:

In hit-and-run criminal trials under Section 279/304A IPC (or BNS sections) and Section 187 MV Act, the prosecution relies heavily on Section 132 flight. Defense counsel should establish that the driver did not flee to evade law, but departed solely to escape mob violence, and immediately reported to the nearest police station under Section 134(b).