Home  /  Motor Vehicles Act  /  Section 128

Section 128: Safety measures for drivers and pillion riders

Motor Vehicles Act • Official Statutory Text & Practice Guide

Statutory Regulation
Legal Standard
Competent Court / Tribunal
Act 1988
Section 127 All 217 Sections of Motor Vehicles Act Section 129

Legal Commentary & Landmark Judgments: Section 128

Section 128 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 establishes mandatory safety norms for two-wheeled motorcycles, restricting pillion carriage to exactly one person seated behind the driver on a securely fixed seat with footrests and handgrips, complemented by protective headgear mandates under Section 129.

  • Strict Single Pillion Rider Limitation: Section 128(1) enacts an absolute prohibition against carrying more than one person in addition to the driver on any two-wheeled motorcycle, making 'triple riding' an explicit statutory offense.
  • Mandatory Structural Seating and Safety Attachments: Pillion passengers must be carried strictly on a proper, securely fixed seat mounted behind the driver's seat, equipped with footrests, sari guards, and safety handgrips as prescribed by Central Motor Vehicles Rules.
  • Central Rulemaking on Protective Measures and Children: Section 128(2) r/w the 2019 amendments empowers the Central Government to prescribe enhanced safety measures, including specialized safety harnesses and crash helmets for children under four years of age.
Key Landmark Precedents:
  • United India Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Tilak Singh (2006) 4 SCC 404: The Supreme Court held that the liability of an insurance company towards pillion riders on a two-wheeler depends strictly on policy terms; under a statutory 'Act Only' policy, an insurer is not liable for death or injury to a gratuitous pillion rider unless extra premium is paid under a comprehensive package policy.
  • Rajesh v. Rajbir Singh (2013) 9 SCC 54: The Supreme Court observed that while safety regulations under Section 128 and helmet requirements under Section 129 must be strictly enforced, the mere fact that a rider or pillion was not wearing a helmet does not automatically constitute contributory negligence unless it is proved that the head injury was directly aggravated by such omission.
Courtroom Practice & Strategic Litigation Guidance:

In two-wheeler accident claims involving triple riding, insurance companies routinely argue that carrying two pillion riders constitutes a breach of permit and policy condition exonerating them. Counter this by demonstrating that triple riding is a regulatory traffic infraction under Section 128/177; the insurer remains liable to third parties unless it proves the overloading was the proximate cause of the collision.

Section 127 All 217 Sections of Motor Vehicles Act Section 129