Section 105: Principles and method of determining compensation and payment thereof

Motor Vehicles Act • Official Statutory Text & Practice Guide

Statutory Regulation
Legal Standard
Competent Court / Tribunal
Act 1988

Legal Commentary & Landmark Judgments: Section 105

Section 105 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 codifies the statutory principles, mathematical formula, and monetary tariffs governing compensation payable by an STU to private operators whose permits are cancelled or curtailed under Section 103, excluding claims where alternative routes are accepted or renewals refused.

  • Statutory Compensation Tariff for Cancellation: Under Section 105(4), compensation for cancelled permits is calculated at ₹200 for every complete month or part exceeding 15 days of the unexpired permit period, and ₹100 for part of a month up to 15 days, subject to a statutory minimum of ₹400 per vehicle.
  • Mathematical Formula for Route Curtailment: Section 105(5) establishes the formula (Y x A) / R for curtailed permits, where 'Y' is the curtailed length/area, 'A' is the unexpired period compensation under sub-section (4), and 'R' is the total original route length or permit area.
  • Categorical Exclusions and Mandatory Interest: Sub-section (2) bars compensation if the operator accepts an alternative route; sub-section (3) bars compensation for refusal to renew a permit; sub-section (6) mandates payment within one month, failing which the STU must pay statutory interest at 7% per annum.
Key Landmark Precedents:
  • Neelam Travels v. State of Rajasthan (1988) Supp SCC 757: The Supreme Court held that compensation payable on nationalization under Section 105 is purely a creature of statute; an operator cannot claim common law damages, prospective business losses, or capitalization of future profits beyond the precise mathematical tariffs prescribed by the Legislature.
  • State of Rajasthan v. Noor Mohd. AIR 1973 SC 2729: The Supreme Court ruled that refusal to renew an expired permit does not amount to cancellation or curtailment; an operator whose permit has expired has no vested property right in the route and is statutorily disentitled to compensation under Section 105(3).
Courtroom Practice & Strategic Litigation Guidance:

When drafting a compensation petition against an STU for route curtailment under Section 105(5), submit certified route-mileage certificates from the RTA establishing variables 'Y' and 'R' precisely. Always incorporate a specific prayer claiming 7% per annum statutory interest running from the 31st day following permit curtailment under the mandatory proviso to Section 105(6).