Section 104: Power of the Committee or the Board to amend its own orders

Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 • Official Statutory Text & Practice Guide

Statutory Regulation
Legal Standard
Competent Court / Tribunal
Act 2015

Legal Commentary & Landmark Judgments: Section 104

Section 104 of the Act empowers the Committee or the Board to amend its own orders to rectify clerical or arithmetical mistakes or errors arising from any accidental slip or omission.

  • Statutory Power to Rectify Inherent Errors: Authorizes the JJB and CWC to correct typographical errors, dates, name misspellings, or mathematical mistakes in custody or bail orders.
  • Suo Motu or On Application Competence: Permits the authority to amend orders on its own motion or upon an application filed by any interested party or probation officer.
  • Inability to Make Substantive Alterations on Merits: Confines the amendment power strictly to clerical or accidental slips; substantive reviews on merits must be pursued through statutory appeal under Section 101.
Key Landmark Precedents:
  • Hari Ram v. State of Rajasthan (2009) 13 SCC 211: Supreme Court affirmed that Section 104 provides a convenient procedural mechanism to correct clerical mistakes in orders without forcing parties into appellate litigation.
  • State of M.P. v. Kedar Narain AIR 1969 MP 110: Affirmed that clerical corrections under special statutes do not constitute impermissible substantive reviews.
  • Sampurna Behura v. Union of India (2018) 4 SCC 433: Affirmed that JJBs possess inherent power to correct procedural mistakes in order-sheets.
Courtroom Practice & Strategic Litigation Guidance:

If a bail or custody order contains a typographical error in the child's father's name or home address stalling release, file an immediate correction praecipe under Section 104; the Board can rectify the error on the same day without formal notice.