Home  /  Industrial Relations Code, 2020  /  Section 9

Section 9: Registration of Trade Union and cancellation thereof

The Industrial Relations Code, 2020 (Act No. 35 of 2020) • Official Statutory Text & Plain English Practice Guide

Statutory Mandate
Chapter III: Trade Unions
Competent Labour Forum
Act No. 35 of 2020
Section 8 All 104 Sections of Industrial Relations Code, 2020 Section 10

Legal Commentary & Landmark Judgments: Section 9

Section 9 of the Industrial Relations Code, 2020 details the procedural mechanism for submitting applications for Trade Union registration, empowering the Registrar to call for further information, inspect records, and direct alterations of proposed names that are deceptively similar to existing registered unions.

  • Application Formalities & Statement of Particulars: Section 9(1) requires that every application for registration be submitted electronically or in writing to the Registrar, accompanied by a copy of the union's rules signed by at least seven worker members, a resolution authorizing the application, and a statement setting forth names, occupations, addresses of applicants, union name, registered office address, and titles/names/ages/occupations of office-bearers.
  • Registrar's Investigatory Power & Evidence Scrutiny: Under Section 9(2), the Registrar is empowered to call for further information and evidence to satisfy himself that the application complies with Sections 7 and 8; the Registrar may refuse registration until such information is furnished and may conduct spot inquiries or verify establishment muster rolls.
  • Deceptive Similarity Veto & Name Alteration Mandate: Section 9(3) prohibits registration under a proposed name that is identical to, or so nearly resembles, the name of an existing registered Trade Union as to deceive the public or workers; the Registrar must require the applicants to alter the name before proceeding with registration.
Key Landmark Precedents:
  • In re Inland Steam Navigation Workers' Union AIR 1936 Cal 57: The Calcutta High Court held that the Registrar's inquiry under registration provisions is strictly limited to verifying compliance with statutory formalities; if statutory particulars and membership requirements are satisfied, the Registrar is legally bound to grant registration without imposing arbitrary hurdles.
  • Tata Electric Companies Officer's Guild v. Registrar of Trade Unions (1995) 2 Mah LJ 811: The Bombay High Court ruled that where an application complies with all statutory requirements, the Registrar cannot withhold registration on the ground that another union already operates in the establishment.
  • Radhakrishnan v. State of Kerala (1998) 2 LLJ 117 (Ker): The Kerala High Court held that the Registrar possesses statutory authority to direct alteration of a proposed trade union name if it is deceptively similar to an existing recognized union, safeguarding workers from confusion and fraudulent representation.
Courtroom Practice & Strategic Litigation Guidance:

When submitting Form I for registration, append verifiable identity documents (Aadhaar/EPF UAN numbers) and muster roll references for all seven applicant workers and the required 10%/100 worker threshold. If a rival group seeks to register a union with a phonetically or visually identical name (e.g., prefixing 'All India' or 'Bhartiya' to an existing brand), immediately file a Section 9(3) caveat and objection before the Registrar demonstrating trade name conflict and brand confusion.

Section 8 All 104 Sections of Industrial Relations Code, 2020 Section 10