Home  /  Industrial Relations Code, 2020  /  Section 71

Section 71: Procedure for retrenchment

The Industrial Relations Code, 2020 (Act No. 35 of 2020) • Official Statutory Text & Plain English Practice Guide

Statutory Mandate
Chapter IX: Lay-off, Retrenchment and Closure
Competent Labour Forum
Act No. 35 of 2020
Section 70 All 104 Sections of Industrial Relations Code, 2020 Section 72

Legal Commentary & Landmark Judgments: Section 71

Section 71 of the Industrial Relations Code, 2020 codifies the foundational industrial jurisprudence principle of 'Last In, First Out' (LIFO) governing the retrenchment of Indian citizen workers within a specific industrial category, mandating that the employer must retrench the junior-most employee in that category unless justifiable, recorded reasons warrant a departure.

  • Statutory 'Last In, First Out' (LIFO) Rule: Where any worker who is a citizen of India is to be retrenched from an industrial establishment and belongs to a particular category of workers, the employer is statutorily mandated to retrench the worker who was the last person to be employed in that specific category, safeguarding senior workmen against arbitrary victimization.
  • Category-Wise and Unit-Wise Seniority Architecture: Seniority rosters must be maintained category-wise (e.g., fitters, turners, welders, data entry operators) within the establishment. Inter-cadre seniority cannot be conflated; an employer cannot retrench a senior worker in one trade or category merely because surplus labor exists in another unrelated operational category unless functional interchangeability and common seniority rosters are contractually established.
  • Statutory Exception: Departure with Recorded Reasons: The section contains an express statutory proviso permitting departure from the LIFO rule ('First In, Last Out' or selective retention of junior workers). However, such departure is lawful strictly if the employer records reasons in writing based on exceptional merit, special technical expertise, operational indispensability, or proven physical incapacity, subject to objective scrutiny by the Industrial Tribunal.
Key Landmark Precedents:
  • Swadesamitran Ltd. v. Their Workmen AIR 1960 SC 762: The Supreme Court held that the employer must strictly adhere to the LIFO rule under Section 25G of the erstwhile Industrial Disputes Act (now codified in Section 71). Any departure from seniority requires reliable, cogent, and recorded evidence demonstrating extraordinary comparative efficiency or indiscipline, failing which the retrenchment is illegal and void.
  • Om Oil & Oilseeds Exchange Ltd. v. Their Workmen AIR 1966 SC 1657: The Supreme Court clarified that category-wise seniority is the bedrock of retrenchment procedure; an employer has no right to retrench senior workers across different operational cadres without proving that the workers belong to the identical industrial category and perform interchangeable job descriptions.
  • Workmen of Sudder Office, Cinnamara v. Management (1971) 2 SCC 38: Held that where an employer departs from the LIFO rule without recording objective, substantiated reasons at the time of retrenchment, the Industrial Tribunal has full jurisdiction to interfere and order immediate reinstatement with continuity of service and back wages.
Courtroom Practice & Strategic Litigation Guidance:

In industrial restructuring, the employer must prepare, verify, and publish a category-wise seniority list on the establishment's notice board and electronic portal at least seven days prior to effecting retrenchment. If management seeks to retain a skilled junior worker over a senior worker, contemporaneous documentation (past performance ratings, disciplinary records, specialized technical certifications) must be compiled and express reasons recorded in the retrenchment order. Failure to record contemporaneous reasons creates an irrebuttable presumption of arbitrary selection before the Tribunal.

Section 70 All 104 Sections of Industrial Relations Code, 2020 Section 72