Home  /  Industrial Relations Code, 2020  /  Section 17

Section 17: Criminal conspiracy in trade disputes

The Industrial Relations Code, 2020 (Act No. 35 of 2020) • Official Statutory Text & Plain English Practice Guide

Statutory Mandate
Chapter III: Trade Unions
Competent Labour Forum
Act No. 35 of 2020
Section 16 All 104 Sections of Industrial Relations Code, 2020 Section 18

Legal Commentary & Landmark Judgments: Section 17

Section 17 of the Industrial Relations Code, 2020 confers substantive criminal immunity upon office-bearers and members of registered Trade Unions against prosecution for criminal conspiracy under Section 120B IPC (now Section 61 BNS, 2023) for agreements entered into in furtherance of legitimate trade disputes, provided such agreement is not an agreement to commit an offence.

  • Statutory Immunity Against Criminal Conspiracy: Section 17 grants complete exemption to office-bearers and members of a registered Trade Union from criminal liability under Section 120B of the Indian Penal Code / Section 61 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 in respect of any agreement made between members for the purpose of furthering any lawful trade union object.
  • The Non-Negotiable Exception — Agreement to Commit an Offence: Section 17 proviso explicitly removes immunity if the agreement is an agreement to commit an offence; any conspiracy to commit physical violence, rioting, assault, wrongful confinement (gherao), extortion, trespass, or sabotage remains fully prosecutable under criminal law.
  • Registered Status as an Indispensable Prerequisite: Criminal conspiracy immunity is statutorily confined to registered Trade Unions; unregistered labor associations, ad-hoc strike committees, and wildcat action bodies enjoy zero statutory protection under Section 17.
Key Landmark Precedents:
  • Rohtas Industries Ltd. v. Rohtas Industries Staff Union (1976) 2 SCC 82: The Supreme Court held that peaceful strikes, collective bargaining agreements, and concerted cessation of work are protected trade dispute activities; union leaders and workers cannot be prosecuted for criminal conspiracy merely for organizing a strike unless penal offences are committed.
  • Jay Engineering Works Ltd. v. State of West Bengal AIR 1968 Cal 407 (Special Bench): The Calcutta High Court held that gherao involving wrongful restraint, confinement, and intimidation of managerial staff is an offence under criminal law; Section 17 provides no immunity whatsoever for agreements to commit criminal acts.
  • Crofter Hand Woven Harris Tweed Co. v. Veitch [1942] AC 435: The House of Lords established the core principle that a combination to advance the legitimate economic interests of workers, absent unlawful means or criminal acts, cannot constitute an actionable or criminal conspiracy.
Courtroom Practice & Strategic Litigation Guidance:

When defending trade union office-bearers against FIRs filed under Section 120B IPC / Section 61 BNS during an industrial dispute, move an immediate quashing petition under Section 482 CrPC / Section 528 BNSS pleading Section 17 immunity and producing the certificate of registration. For management facing violent picketing, ensure police complaints and evidentiary affidavits detail specific penal offences (e.g., criminal trespass, wrongful confinement, intimidation) supported by CCTV footage to defeat Section 17 immunity.

Section 16 All 104 Sections of Industrial Relations Code, 2020 Section 18