Section 86: Interpretation of words repeated in different parts of will
Indian Succession Act • Official Statutory Text & Practice Guide
Statutory Regulation
Legal Standard
Competent Court / Tribunal
Act 1925
Indian Succession Act • Official Statutory Text & Practice Guide
Legal Commentary & Landmark Judgments: Section 86
Section 86 establishes a presumption of semantic consistency, providing that words occurring more than once in a will are presumed to be used in the same sense throughout, unless a contrary intention appears.
This presumption is rebuttable: where the context of a particular clause or the subject matter clearly demonstrates that the testator used the repeated word in a different, narrower, or broader sense, the presumption yields to the evident intention. However, the initial burden rests upon the party asserting a semantic shift to establish that the testator intended different meanings in different paragraphs.
Section 86 is especially pertinent when interpreting terms like 'children', 'issue', 'property', or 'heirs' appearing across multiple bequests. If 'children' in Clause 3 clearly excludes step-children, Section 86 presumes that 'children' in the residuary Clause 10 also excludes step-children, creating uniform interpretation throughout the estate.