Section 386: Validation of certain payments made in good faith to holder of invalid certificate

Indian Succession Act • Official Statutory Text & Practice Guide

Statutory Regulation
Legal Standard
Competent Court / Tribunal
Act 1925

Legal Commentary & Landmark Judgments: Section 386

Section 386 validates payments made in good faith to the holder of a succession certificate before its revocation or supersession, protecting debtors from duplicate liability.

  • Payment in Good Faith: The debtor pays a debt or delivers securities to the holder of a succession certificate with honest belief in its validity, without knowledge of invalidating circumstances.
  • Subsistence of Apparent Authority: The payment is made prior to the formal revocation, supersession, or surrender of the certificate under Section 383 or 389.
  • Statutory Discharge of Debtor: The payment operates as a complete legal discharge of the debtor, protecting them from subsequent claims by a newly appointed administrator or true heir.
Key Landmark Precedents:
  • State of Bihar v. Radha Krishna Singh, (1983) 2 SCC 118: The Supreme Court noted that summary grants like succession certificates are designed to protect third-party debtors paying in good faith, providing full statutory discharge under Section 386.
  • Mathura Prasad v. Ramcharan, AIR 1953 All 208: Held that a bank or debtor paying the holder of a succession certificate is fully discharged under Section 386, even if the certificate is subsequently cancelled for fraud or concealment.
Courtroom Practice & Strategic Litigation Guidance:

Banks, insurance companies, and debtors sued by heirs after paying out on a succession certificate must invoke Section 386 in their written statement, proving bona fide disbursal prior to any court injunction or revocation notice.