Section 297: Payment to executor or administrator before probate or administration revoked

Indian Succession Act • Official Statutory Text & Practice Guide

Statutory Regulation
Legal Standard
Competent Court / Tribunal
Act 1925

Legal Commentary & Landmark Judgments: Section 297

Section 297 provides statutory protection and indemnity for bona fide payments made to an executor or administrator before his probate or administration was revoked.

  • Bona Fide Payments Protected: All bona fide payments made to any executor or administrator under a grant of probate or letters of administration before the revocation of such grant operate as a complete legal discharge to the payer.
  • Commercial Transaction Certainty: Protects banks, debtors, tenants, and purchasers who dealt with the representative in good faith reliance upon the court's sealed grant.
  • Recovery Against Defrocked Representative: The rightful successor's remedy is solely to claim the money from the hands of the revoked representative, not from the innocent third-party payer.
Key Landmark Precedents:
  • Suraj Lamp & Industries v. State of Haryana (2012) 1 SCC 656: The Supreme Court affirmed that Section 297 protects commercial certainty by immunizing third parties who make bona fide payments in reliance on sealed judicial grants before revocation.
  • Chiranjilal Shrilal Goenka v. Jasjit Singh (1993) 2 SCC 507: Held that Section 297 reconciles the in-rem authority of past court decrees with the rights of innocent commercial actors.
Courtroom Practice & Strategic Litigation Guidance:

Banks and debtors sued by a new administrator for funds previously paid to a revoked executor should cite Section 297; so long as payment was made prior to the service of the revocation order, the bank is completely discharged.