Section 178: Child prima facie entitled to legacy as well as portion

Indian Succession Act • Official Statutory Text & Practice Guide

Statutory Regulation
Legal Standard
Competent Court / Tribunal
Act 1925

Legal Commentary & Landmark Judgments: Section 178

Section 178 establishes that where a parent makes an advancement or portion to a child during his lifetime, the child does not lose any legacy bequeathed to him in a prior will.

  • Rejection of Presumption Against Double Portions: Where a parent who has made a will giving a legacy to a child afterwards provides a portion or advancement for that child during life, the legacy is not adeemed or satisfied.
  • Preservation of Testamentary Gift: The child is entitled to receive both the inter vivos advancement and the full testamentary legacy under the will.
  • Express Satisfaction Required: The legacy is extinguished only if the parent in writing explicitly declared that the advancement was in satisfaction of the testamentary gift.
Key Landmark Precedents:
  • Navneet Lal v. Gokul (1976) 1 SCC 630: The Supreme Court noted that Indian succession law under Section 178 does not automatically import technical English doctrines of ademption of portions, requiring clear evidence of intended satisfaction.
  • Ranganathan Chettiar v. Periakaruppan Chettiar AIR 1957 SC 815: Affirmed that advancements made during a parent's lifetime do not reduce testamentary legacies unless expressly documented.
Courtroom Practice & Strategic Litigation Guidance:

If siblings object to a daughter receiving her will legacy on grounds that 'she was already given a dowry/advancement of Rs. 15 Lakhs at her wedding', cite Section 178; lifetime parental gifts do not diminish or satisfy testamentary bequests.