Section 156: Ademptionpro tanto by testator's receipt of portion of entire fund of which portion has been specically bequeathed

Indian Succession Act • Official Statutory Text & Practice Guide

Statutory Regulation
Legal Standard
Competent Court / Tribunal
Act 1925

Legal Commentary & Landmark Judgments: Section 156

Section 156 governs ademption pro tanto where a portion of an entire fund has been specifically bequeathed and the testator receives part of that entire fund.

  • Receipt from Entire Fund: Where a portion of an entire fund is specifically bequeathed, and the testator receives a part of the entire fund, the bequest is adeemed pro tanto only if the remaining fund is insufficient.
  • Exhaustion Priority: The testator is presumed to have drawn from his own un-bequeathed portion of the fund first, preserving the specifically bequeathed portion so long as sufficient funds remain.
  • Deficiency Apportionment: Only if the testator's withdrawal depletes the fund below the specifically bequeathed sum does an ademption pro tanto occur for the deficiency.
Key Landmark Precedents:
  • Subramaniam v. Ramaswamy (1932) 34 BOMLR 1612: The Privy Council recognized that under Section 156, the law presumes the testator drew his own unallocated share first to protect the legatee's specific allocation.
  • Ranganathan Chettiar v. Periakaruppan Chettiar AIR 1957 SC 815: Affirmed that specific apportionments from bank funds are preserved against ademption to the maximum extent of the surviving balance.
Courtroom Practice & Strategic Litigation Guidance:

If a testator had Rs. 20 Lakhs in an account, bequeathed Rs. 5 Lakhs out of it to X, and later withdrew Rs. 10 Lakhs, the surviving balance of Rs. 10 Lakhs fully covers X's bequest; Section 156 ensures X receives his full Rs. 5 Lakhs without ademption.