Section 65: Fraudulent or malicious initiation of proceedings

Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 • Official Statutory Text & Practice Guide

Statutory Regulation
Legal Standard
Competent Court / Tribunal
Act 2016

Legal Commentary & Landmark Judgments: Section 65

Section 65 prescribes stringent punitive penalties for initiating insolvency proceedings fraudulently or with malicious intent for purposes other than resolution or liquidation.

  • Penal Consequences & Liability: Where any person initiates CIRP, pre-packaged insolvency, or liquidation fraudulently or with malicious intent, the Adjudicating Authority may impose a financial penalty ranging between ₹1 Lakh and ₹1 Crore.
  • Fraudulent Initiation Penalties: This provision serves as a critical statutory deterrent against the abuse of process by creditors using insolvency as a summary debt-collection bludgeon or promoters orchestrating sham filings to trigger moratorium protections.
Key Landmark Precedents:
  • Beacon Trusteeship Ltd. v. Earthcon Infracon Pvt. Ltd. (2020) SCC OnLine SC 1233: Held that where allegations of collusion and fraud between the applicant and corporate debtor are raised, NCLT must thoroughly examine whether Section 65 is attracted before admitting CIRP.
  • Swiss Ribbons Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India (2019) 4 SCC 17: Emphasized that Section 65 acts as an effective legislative check against frivolous, speculative, or malicious insolvency applications.
Legal Commentary:

Section 65 polices the statutory gateway of the IBC. It empowers tribunals to penalize litigants who weaponize insolvency machinery for collateral commercial coercion or fraudulent asset protection.