Section 25: Duties of resolution professional

Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 • Official Statutory Text & Practice Guide

Statutory Regulation
Legal Standard
Competent Court / Tribunal
Act 2016

Legal Commentary & Landmark Judgments: Section 25

Section 25 sets forth the affirmative statutory duties of the Resolution Professional to take custody and control of corporate debtor assets, represent the corporate debtor, maintain operations as a going concern, and investigate avoidance transactions.

  • Custody and Asset Control: The RP must immediately take custody and control of all tangible and intangible assets, business records, title deeds, and bank accounts of the corporate debtor.
  • Going Concern Management: Mandated to maintain the corporate debtor as a going concern, managing commercial contracts, client relationships, and employee operations during the CIRP.
  • Avoidance Investigation (Section 25(2)(j)): Statutorily obligated to file avoidance applications before the Adjudicating Authority in respect of preferential, undervalued, extortionate, or fraudulent transactions.
  • Invitation of Resolution Plans: Prepares the Information Memorandum, issues Form G, invites Expression of Interest (EOI), and submits compliant resolution plans to the Committee of Creditors.
Key Landmark Precedents:
  • ArcelorMittal India Pvt. Ltd. v. Satish Kumar Gupta (2019) 2 SCC 1: The Supreme Court held that the Resolution Professional is an officer of the court and a facilitator who must ensure compliance with Section 29A and statutory requirements before placing plans before the CoC.
  • Anuj Jain v. Axis Bank Ltd. (2020) 8 SCC 401: The Supreme Court underscored that the RP has an affirmative statutory duty under Section 25(2)(j) to rigorously investigate past asset alienations and file clawback applications before the NCLT.
Courtroom Practice & Strategic Litigation Guidance:

The Resolution Professional must not assume an adjudicatory role when screening resolution plans; his statutory remit under Section 25 is administrative and facilitative. However, failure to examine avoidance transactions can attract personal disciplinary proceedings by the IBBI.