Section 19: Personnel to extend cooperation to interim resolution professional

Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 • Official Statutory Text & Practice Guide

Statutory Regulation
Legal Standard
Competent Court / Tribunal
Act 2016

Legal Commentary & Landmark Judgments: Section 19

Section 19 imposes mandatory statutory duties on the personnel, promoters, and auditors of the corporate debtor to extend full cooperation and assistance to the IRP, and empowers the NCLT to pass coercive orders for non-cooperation.

  • Mandatory Duty to Cooperate: The personnel, promoters, and any other person associated with the management of the corporate debtor shall extend all assistance and cooperation to the IRP as he may require.
  • NCLT Application for Non-Cooperation (Section 19(2)): Where any personnel or promoter fails to assist or cooperate, the IRP may apply to the Adjudicating Authority for necessary directions.
  • Coercive Judicial Directions (Section 19(3)): The NCLT may direct such personnel to comply with instructions, furnish books of accounts, passwords, keys, and physical assets, backed by civil imprisonment or police assistance.
Key Landmark Precedents:
  • K. Sashidhar v. Indian Overseas Bank (2019) 12 SCC 150: The Supreme Court affirmed that promoters are statutorily bound under Section 19 to provide complete access to books and accounts; recalcitrance justifies severe judicial intervention.
  • Tata Consultancy Services Ltd. v. Vishal Ghisulal Jain (2022) 2 SCC 583: Reaffirmed that Section 19 provides the operational machinery for the IRP to take actual physical custody of corporate records and IT infrastructure.
Courtroom Practice & Strategic Litigation Guidance:

If promoters refuse to hand over ERP passwords, Tally accounting data, statutory registers, or factory keys, do not waste time on repetitive emails. Immediately file an interlocutory application (IA) under Section 19(2) before the NCLT seeking police assistance and coercive summons.