Section 118: Repayment plan coming to end prematurely

Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 • Official Statutory Text & Practice Guide

Statutory Regulation
Legal Standard
Competent Court / Tribunal
Act 2016

Legal Commentary & Landmark Judgments: Section 118

Section 118 provides the statutory mechanism and consequences when a repayment plan fails or comes to an end prematurely due to debtor default or insolvency impracticability.

  • Grounds for Premature End: A repayment plan comes to a premature end if the debtor defaults in executing scheduled payments, breaches fundamental covenants, or dies prior to full implementation.
  • Resolution Professional's Duty to Report: The resolution professional must immediately prepare and submit a default report to the Adjudicating Authority and all creditors stating the nature and value of the default.
  • Adjudicating Authority Declaration: The Adjudicating Authority examines the report and formally orders the premature termination of the plan, opening the gateway for bankruptcy proceedings under Chapter IV.
Key Landmark Precedents:
  • Dilip B. Jiwrajka v. Union of India (2024) 5 SCC 436: The Supreme Court held that the failure of a consensual repayment plan under Section 118 is a statutory condition precedent that triggers the creditor's right to seek individual bankruptcy.
  • Swiss Ribbons Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India (2019) 4 SCC 17: Reiterated that the statutory timeline and consequences of default under the Code are sacrosanct to prevent endless recovery stalling by insolvent borrowers.
Courtroom Practice & Strategic Litigation Guidance:

Upon receiving an adverse report under Section 118, creditors should immediately secure certified copies of the Adjudicating Authority's termination order to substantiate their Section 121 bankruptcy petition and preserve their debt priority.