Section 111: Approval of repayment plan by creditors

Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 • Official Statutory Text & Practice Guide

Statutory Regulation
Legal Standard
Competent Court / Tribunal
Act 2016

Legal Commentary & Landmark Judgments: Section 111

Section 111 establishes the high statutory voting threshold required for the approval of a repayment plan, mandating approval by a majority of more than three-fourths in value of creditors voting.

  • 75% Super-Majority Standard: The repayment plan or any modification to the plan shall be approved by a majority of more than three-fourths (75%) in value of the creditors present in person or by proxy and voting.
  • Calculation on Voting Creditors: The 75% threshold is calculated on the value of debts of creditors who actually participate and cast votes, not on the total debt roster.
  • Democratic Legitimacy: Ensures that a restructuring plan carries overwhelming creditor endorsement before receiving judicial sanction.
Key Landmark Precedents:
  • Dilip B. Jiwrajka v. Union of India (2024) 5 SCC 436: The Supreme Court held that the 75% voting requirement under Section 111 reflects the commercial supremacy of creditors in individual debt restructuring, ensuring robust consensus.
  • Committee of Creditors of Essar Steel India Ltd. v. Satish Kumar Gupta (2020) 8 SCC 531: Affirmed that super-majority creditor approvals bind dissenting minority creditors.
Courtroom Practice & Strategic Litigation Guidance:

Calculate voting percentages under Section 111 meticulously: sum the admitted claim value of all creditors voting in favor and divide by the total value of creditors who cast valid votes. If the ratio exceeds 75.01%, the plan is lawfully approved.