Section 29: Savings

Hindu Marriage Act • Official Statutory Text & Practice Guide

Statutory Regulation
Legal Standard
Competent Court / Tribunal
Act 1955

Legal Commentary & Landmark Judgments: Section 29

Section 29 contains vital statutory savings protecting existing rights, recognizing the legal validity of customary divorces obtained outside court, and preserving pending proceedings and Special Marriage Act options.

  • Saving of Pre-Act Valid Marriages: A marriage solemnized between Hindus before the commencement of this Act, which is otherwise valid, is not deemed invalid merely because it was between different castes or sub-castes.
  • Saving of Customary Divorce (Section 29(2)): Expressly saves any custom or special enactment conferring a right to obtain the dissolution of a Hindu marriage, whether solemnized before or after the commencement of the Act, without requiring a decree under Section 13.
  • Preservation of Special Marriage Rights: Clarifies that nothing in the Act affects the provisions of the Special Marriage Act, 1954 regarding marriages solemnized or registered thereunder.
  • Saving of Pending Proceedings: Protects petitions and legal proceedings pending on the date the Act came into force, allowing them to be decided under pre-existing law.
Key Landmark Precedents:
  • Yamanaji H. Jadhav v. Nirmala (2002) 2 SCC 637: The Supreme Court held that customary divorce under Section 29(2) is an exception to the general law. The party relying on a customary divorce must specifically plead and strictly establish by cogent evidence that the custom is ancient, certain, reasonable, and recognized by the community.
  • Subramani v. M. Chandralekha (2005) 9 SCC 407: The Supreme Court ruled that a deed of divorce executed before a panchayat or notary is void in the absence of proof of an ancient, unbroken customary right permitting extra-judicial dissolution of marriage.
Courtroom Practice & Strategic Litigation Guidance:

Whenever a spouse sets up an out-of-court divorce deed (chhut-chhutti, talaq-e-bidat equivalent, or panchayat fariqati), invoke Section 29(2). Challenge the deed by demanding proof of ancient custom, past instances of community enforcement, and compliance with public policy under Section 23.