Home  /  Haryana Urban (Control of Rent and Eviction) Act, 1973  /  Section 11

Section 11: Conversion of a residential building into a non-residential building

Haryana Urban (Control of Rent and Eviction) Act, 1973 • Official Statutory Text & Practice Guide

Statutory Regulation
Legal Standard
Competent Court / Tribunal
Act 1973
Section 10 All 24 Sections of Haryana Urban (Control of Rent and Eviction) Act, 1973 Section 12

Legal Commentary & Landmark Judgments: Section 11

Section 11 imposes an absolute prohibition on converting a residential building into a non-residential building without the prior written permission of the Rent Controller, preserving urban residential housing stock.

  • Mandatory Statutory Prohibition on Conversion: Bars any person, whether landlord or tenant, from converting a residential building into a non-residential or commercial building without obtaining prior written permission from the Rent Controller.
  • Preservation of Urban Housing Stock as Legislative Policy: Protects public interest by preventing landlords and tenants from depleting scarce residential accommodations for commercial exploitation or lucrative commercial tenancies.
  • Inoperability of Private Consent and Contractual Waivers: Renders mutual agreement between landlord and tenant ineffective to sanction conversion, as statutory rent control restrictions operate in rem to safeguard town planning classifications.
Key Landmark Precedents:
  • Hari Rao v. N. Govindachari, (2005) 7 SCC 779: Held that user classification under rent control statutes must be strictly maintained; incidental professional or non-commercial activity does not amount to conversion, but substantial commercialization without statutory sanction is prohibited.
  • Nand Kishore v. Yash Pal, (2009) 16 SCC 634: Held that conversion of a residential building into a commercial facility without Controller permission under Section 11 is illegal and constitutes a ground for tenant eviction, while exposing the violator to penal sanctions under Section 22.
  • Bikramjit Singh v. Gurbachan Singh, 1981 (1) RCR (Rent) 316 (P&H): Held that Section 11 imposes an absolute bar on conversion without written permission of the Rent Controller; landlord consent cannot validate illegal conversion because statutory restrictions are enacted in public interest.
Courtroom Practice & Strategic Litigation Guidance:

When a landlord seeks to evict a tenant for 'change of user' under Section 13(2)(ii)(b), concurrently invoke Section 11 to demonstrate that the tenant's unauthorized commercial use violates public law. When representing an owner desiring conversion, file a formal application before the Rent Controller showing locality commercialization, zoning master plan compatibility, and no adverse impact on residential neighborhood amenities.

Section 10 All 24 Sections of Haryana Urban (Control of Rent and Eviction) Act, 1973 Section 12