Section 172: Transitional provisions

Electricity Act • Official Statutory Text & Practice Guide

Statutory Regulation
Legal Standard
Competent Court / Tribunal
Act 2003

Legal Commentary & Landmark Judgments: Section 172

Section 172 of the Act establishes transitional provisions, ensuring the uninterrupted continuation of State Electricity Boards, licenses, and existing tariffs during the initial phase of the Act's commencement.

  • One-Year Transitional Continuance of SEBs: Permitted State Electricity Boards to continue functioning as deemed transmission and distribution licensees for a maximum period of one year (extendable by agreement).
  • Transitional Grandfathering of Existing Tariffs: Provided that existing tariffs determined under repealed enactments remained valid until superseded by newly determined tariffs under Section 62.
  • Smooth Transition to Competitive Market Regime: Prevented regulatory vacuums and grid collapse during the transition from state monopolies to unbundled corporate structures.
Key Landmark Precedents:
  • Gujarat Urja Vikas Nigam Ltd. v. Essar Power Ltd. (2008) 4 SCC 755: Supreme Court affirmed that transitional provisions under Section 172 ensured administrative continuity while new regulatory authorities were established.
  • Brihanmumbai Electric Supply v. MERC (2013) 4 SCC 71: Affirmed that legacy distribution licenses and operational franchises were transitioned smoothly under Section 172.
  • PTC India Ltd. v. CERC (2010) 4 SCC 603: Affirmed the constitutionality of transitional grandfathering provisions in economic legislation.
Courtroom Practice & Strategic Litigation Guidance:

In disputes involving pre-2003 power purchase contracts, cite Section 172 to demonstrate that lawful agreements transitioned intact into the new statutory regime and remain enforceable before the Regulatory Commission.