Section 166: Coordination Forum

Electricity Act • Official Statutory Text & Practice Guide

Statutory Regulation
Legal Standard
Competent Court / Tribunal
Act 2003

Legal Commentary & Landmark Judgments: Section 166

Section 166 of the Act mandates the establishment of Coordination Forums at national, state, and district levels to coordinate power generation, transmission, rural electrification, and consumer grievance redressal.

  • Multi-Tier Coordination Architecture: Establishes National, State, and District Electricity Committees to integrate power sector planning across central, state, and local bodies.
  • Focus on Rural Electrification & Quality: Charges District Committees with monitoring rural electrification progress, quality of power supply, and consumer complaint resolution.
  • Institutional Interface with Local Government: Provides a formal institutional bridge between power distribution utilities, Panchayati Raj institutions, and elected representatives.
Key Landmark Precedents:
  • Brihanmumbai Electric Supply v. MERC (2013) 4 SCC 71: Supreme Court highlighted that coordination forums under Section 166 bridge the gap between technical utility operations and democratic consumer oversight.
  • PTC India Ltd. v. CERC (2010) 4 SCC 603: Affirmed that institutional coordination ensures balanced regional power development.
  • West Bengal Electricity Regulatory Commission v. CESC Ltd. (2002) 8 SCC 715: Affirmed that multi-tiered consultative forums enhance utility responsiveness.
Courtroom Practice & Strategic Litigation Guidance:

Consumer organizations should actively attend District Coordination Committee meetings under Section 166(5), submitting formal memoranda regarding low rural voltage and distribution transformer burnouts to compel administrative rectification.