Section 134: Payment of compensation of damages or transfer

Electricity Act • Official Statutory Text & Practice Guide

Statutory Regulation
Legal Standard
Competent Court / Tribunal
Act 2003

Legal Commentary & Landmark Judgments: Section 134

Section 134 of the Act provides for the payment of compensation or damages on transfer, clarifying that no officer or employee shall be entitled to retrenchment compensation under industrial disputes legislation merely on account of transfer under a Section 131 scheme.

  • Bar on Concurrent Retrenchment Compensation Claims: Explicitly bars transferred employees from claiming retrenchment compensation under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 where continuity of service and pay are protected under Section 133.
  • Seamless Continuity of Service: Deems service rendered under the former Board to be continuous service under the successor company for all statutory purposes.
  • Protection of Industrial Restructuring Feasibility: Prevents financial paralysis of restructuring by precluding massive severance claims where employment remains uninterrupted.
Key Landmark Precedents:
  • State of Gujarat v. Essar Power Ltd. (2008) 4 SCC 755: Supreme Court affirmed that Section 134 operates in tandem with Section 133: since service is protected, no retrenchment occurs in law or fact.
  • Steel Authority of India Ltd. v. National Union Waterfront Workers (2001) 7 SCC 1: Affirmed that statutory transfer of undertakings with protected service conditions does not trigger retrenchment liabilities.
  • Brihanmumbai Electric Supply v. MERC (2013) 4 SCC 71: Affirmed the legal stability of unbundling transfer schemes.
Courtroom Practice & Strategic Litigation Guidance:

In defending successor power companies against severance or retrenchment claims filed by transferred employees, invoke Section 134 to demonstrate that full service continuity was maintained, barring Section 25FF Industrial Disputes Act compensation.