Section 117: Resignation and removal

Electricity Act • Official Statutory Text & Practice Guide

Statutory Regulation
Legal Standard
Competent Court / Tribunal
Act 2003

Legal Commentary & Landmark Judgments: Section 117

Section 117 of the Act prescribes the procedure for the resignation and removal of the Chairperson or Members of the Appellate Tribunal, providing that removal can be effected only after a formal inquiry by a Supreme Court Judge on grounds of proven misbehavior or incapacity.

  • High Judicial Safeguard for Removal: Precludes summary executive removal; mandates that removal can occur only upon an adverse report by a Supreme Court Judge following a full judicial inquiry.
  • Exhaustive Statutory Grounds for Removal: Restricts removal grounds strictly to proven misbehavior, physical/mental incapacity, insolvency, conviction of moral turpitude, or acquiring conflicting commercial interests.
  • Voluntary Resignation Procedure: Permits members to resign by giving three months' notice in writing to the Central Government.
Key Landmark Precedents:
  • Union of India v. R. Gandhi (2010) 11 SCC 1: Constitution Bench held that the requirement of an inquiry by a Supreme Court Judge before removing a tribunal member is an essential feature of judicial independence.
  • State of Gujarat v. Utility Users' Welfare Association (2018) 6 SCC 21: Supreme Court affirmed that removal protections under Section 117 shield APTEL members from executive retaliation for ruling against government utilities.
  • Madras Bar Association v. Union of India (2021) 7 SCC 369: Affirmed the constitutional inviolability of judicial inquiry safeguards in tribunal removals.
Courtroom Practice & Strategic Litigation Guidance:

The rigorous removal threshold under Section 117 ensures that APTEL judges can fearlessly set aside politically motivated state government tariff orders or executive directions without fear of administrative reprisal.