Section 33: Penalty for not discharging duty by Protection Officer

Domestic Violence Act, 2005 • Official Statutory Text & Practice Guide

Statutory Regulation
Legal Standard
Competent Court / Tribunal
Act 2005

Legal Commentary & Landmark Judgments: Section 33

Section 33 creates a specialized statutory criminal penal provision against Protection Officers who fail or refuse to discharge their statutory duties as directed by the Magistrate without reasonable cause.

  • Criminal Penal Sanction: If any Protection Officer, without sufficient cause, fails or refuses to discharge duties as directed by the Magistrate in an order, such officer commits an offence under Section 33.
  • Prescribed Punishment: Punishable with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to one year, or with fine which may extend to twenty thousand rupees, or with both.
  • Condition Precedent - Court Order: Liability attaches specifically to default in discharging duties directed by the Magistrate in an order (such as executing residence orders or filing inspection reports).
Key Landmark Precedents:
  • Inderjit Singh Grewal v. State of Punjab (2011) 12 SCC 588: The Supreme Court observed that the scheme of the DV Act creates checks and balances to prevent both judicial delay and administrative abdication by designated officers.
  • Vimlaben Ajitbhai Patel v. Vatslaben Ashokbhai Patel (2008) 4 SCC 649: Observed that statutory officers are bound to execute judicial warrants strictly within the confines of law without harassing non-parties.
Courtroom Practice & Strategic Litigation Guidance:

Section 33 is an exceptional coercive remedy. If a Protection Officer colludes with the respondent or deliberately suppresses a Domestic Incident Report, move an application before the Magistrate seeking an inquiry under Section 33, subject to the prior sanction requirement under Section 34.