Section 26: Relief in other suits and legal proceedings

Domestic Violence Act, 2005 • Official Statutory Text & Practice Guide

Statutory Regulation
Legal Standard
Competent Court / Tribunal
Act 2005

Legal Commentary & Landmark Judgments: Section 26

Section 26 provides that any relief available under Sections 18, 19, 20, 21, and 22 may also be sought in any legal proceeding before a Family Court, Civil Court, or Criminal Court.

  • Sub-Section (3) Provision: Sub-section (3) mandates full disclosure: if any relief has been obtained by the aggrieved person in any other court, she is bound to inform the Magistrate handling the DV proceeding.
  • Procedural Scope: Sets the parameters for invoking statutory remedies and judicial protections.

Section 26 eliminates jurisdictional silos by allowing domestic violence reliefs to be sought concurrently in any pending civil, family, or criminal proceedings.

Key Landmark Precedents:
  • Rajnesh v. Neha (2020) 10 SCC 703: Held that Section 26 permits concurrent claims but mandates complete adjustment and disclosure to prevent unjust double enrichment across multiple legal forums.
  • Satish Chander Ahuja v. Sneha Ahuja (2020) 10 SCC 756: Held that Family Courts and Civil Courts handling eviction or partition suits are fully competent to grant residence orders under Section 19 by virtue of Section 26.
Legal Commentary:

Section 26 prevents multiplicity of litigation by empowering civil and family judges to grant domestic violence reliefs directly. A woman defending a divorce petition or restitution suit in Family Court can simultaneously seek residence and protection orders without filing a separate proceeding before a Magistrate.