Section 19: Residence orders

Domestic Violence Act, 2005 • Official Statutory Text & Practice Guide

Civil Direction
Judicial Order
JMFC / Mahila Court
Act 2005

Legal Commentary & Landmark Judgments: Section 19

Section 19 equips the Magistrate with expansive powers to pass Residence Orders, restraining eviction, directing the removal of the respondent, or ordering alternative accommodation.

  • Restraining Dispossession: The Magistrate may restrain the respondent from dispossessing or in any other manner disturbing the possession of the aggrieved person from the shared household.
  • Exclusion of Violent Respondent: The court can direct the respondent to remove himself from the shared household, prohibiting him from entering any portion where the aggrieved person resides.
  • Alternative Accommodation & Rent: If joint living is impossible, the Magistrate may direct the respondent to secure alternate accommodation of the same level as enjoyed by her in the shared household or pay rent.

Section 19 provides expansive housing security, empowering the court to restrain dispossession, exclude violent respondents, or mandate equivalent alternative accommodation.

Key Landmark Precedents:
  • Satish Chander Ahuja v. Sneha Ahuja (2020) 10 SCC 756: Clarified the balancing of rights under Section 19: while a woman cannot be casually evicted, elderly in-laws may seek separate peaceful living arrangements provided equivalent alternate accommodation or rent is secured.
  • Prabha Tyagi v. Kamlesh Devi (2022) 5 SCC 801: Affirmed that Section 19 residence orders can be passed even in favor of a widowed daughter-in-law against shared household properties.
Legal Commentary:

Section 19 provides teeth to the residence guarantee under Section 17. The Magistrate possesses flexible powers to order physical segregation within the shared house, lock out abusive male respondents, or mandate the husband to pay high-standard market rent for independent accommodation, completely barring arbitrary homelessness.