Section 86: Suits against foreign Rulers, Ambassadors and Envoys

Code of Civil Procedure • Official Statutory Text & Practice Guide

Statutory Regulation
Legal Standard
Competent Court / Tribunal
Act 1908
Statutory Defined Terms in this Section: (Click any term for official legal definition)

Legal Commentary & Landmark Judgments: Section 86

Section 86 codifies foreign sovereign immunity, barring any suit from being instituted against any foreign State, Ruler, Ambassador, or Envoy in any court except with the prior written consent of the Central Government certified by a Secretary to that Government.

  • Mandatory Central Government Consent: No foreign State may be sued in any court otherwise competent to try the suit except with the consent of the Central Government certified in writing by a Secretary to that Government.
  • Statutory Grounds for Consent [Sec 86(2)]: Consent granted only if: (a) foreign State has instituted a suit against the applicant, (b) foreign State trades within jurisdiction, (c) foreign State is in possession of immoveable property in jurisdiction, or (d) foreign State has expressly waived immunity.
  • Exemption from Arrest & Attachment [Sec 86(3)]: No decree can be executed against property of a foreign State without Central Government consent; no Ruler/Ambassador can be arrested in civil execution.
  • Condition Precedent to Suit: Absence of Section 86 consent is fatal to the maintainability of the suit at the threshold.
Key Landmark Precedents:
  • Mirza Ali Akbar Kashani v. United Arab Republic, AIR 1966 SC 230: The Constitution Bench authoritatively settled that Section 86 creates an absolute statutory bar; no suit can be instituted against a foreign State without prior Central Government consent, and domestic courts have no jurisdiction to entertain suits absent such certificate.
  • Ethiopian Airlines v. Stic Travels (P) Ltd., (2001) 7 SCC 440: The Supreme Court clarified that Section 86 applies to foreign States and rulers, but state-owned commercial corporations carrying on airline or trade activities in India are governed by restrictive immunity and can be sued for commercial breaches.
  • K.M. Cherian v. State of Kerala, 2021 SCC OnLine Ker 2310: Affirmed that Section 86 consent is a jurisdictional prerequisite that cannot be waived by a trial court.
Courtroom Practice & Strategic Litigation Guidance:

Before filing a civil suit against a foreign embassy or foreign state, submit a formal application to the Ministry of External Affairs under Section 86 seeking central consent; filing without consent leads to immediate dismissal under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC.