Section 25: Power of Supreme Court to transfer suits, etc.

Code of Civil Procedure • Official Statutory Text & Practice Guide

Statutory Regulation
Legal Standard
Competent Court / Tribunal
Act 1908
Statutory Defined Terms in this Section: (Click any term for official legal definition)

Legal Commentary & Landmark Judgments: Section 25

Section 25 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 confers plenary statutory authority upon the Supreme Court of India to transfer any civil suit, appeal, or other proceeding from a High Court or subordinate civil court in one State to a competent civil court in another State.

  • Core Legal Standard: Substituted by the 1976 CPC Amendment, Section 25 establishes a comprehensive national transfer mechanism exercised exclusively by the Supreme Court upon formal motion supported by an affidavit.
  • Operational Mechanism: The sole statutory touchstone governing the exercise of this extraordinary power is whether transfer is "expedient for the ends of justice".

Grounded in constitutional equity, the Court assesses factors such as reasonable apprehension of bias, local communal or administrative hostility, physical safety of litigants, severe financial distress, and the comparative balance of convenience.

To deter abuse, sub-section (4) empowers the Supreme Court to penalize frivolous or vexatious transfer petitions by awarding compensatory costs up to two thousand rupees to the opposing party. Under sub-section (5), an indispensable choice-of-law rule is codified: the transferee court must apply the substantive law that the originating court ought to have applied, preventing litigants from utilizing Section 25 transfers to engage in forum shopping or escape local statutory protections (such as State rent control or tenancy enactments).

Key Landmark Precedents:
  • Dr. Subramanian Swamy v. Ramakrishna Hegde, (1990) 1 SCC 4: The Supreme Court held that the paramount consideration under Section 25 is the interest of justice; the mere convenience of one party cannot eclipse the fundamental requirement of an impartial and untrammeled trial.
  • Sumita Singh v. Kumar Sanjay, (2001) 10 SCC 41: The Supreme Court established that in matrimonial transfer petitions under Section 25, the convenience and financial circumstances of the wife are primary considerations, particularly regarding long-distance inter-state travel.
Legal Commentary:

Petitions under Section 25 must be instituted as Transfer Petitions (Civil) before the Supreme Court under Order XLI of the Supreme Court Rules, 2013. The petition must be accompanied by an application for stay of trial court proceedings; upon issuance of notice, trial proceedings before the originating court are customarily stayed pending final determination.