Section 137: Language of subordinate Courts

Code of Civil Procedure • Official Statutory Text & Practice Guide

Statutory Regulation
Legal Standard
Competent Court / Tribunal
Act 1908
Statutory Defined Terms in this Section: (Click any term for official legal definition)

Legal Commentary & Landmark Judgments: Section 137

Section 137 establishes that the language which on the commencement of the Code is the language of any court subordinate to a High Court shall continue to be the language of such subordinate court, subject to the State Government's declaration.

  • Subordinate Court Language Continuation: The language which, on the commencement of this Code, is the language of any court subordinate to a High Court shall continue to be the language of such subordinate court until the State Government otherwise directs.
  • State Declaration Powers: State Government may declare what shall be the language of any such court and in what language applications and proceedings shall be written.
  • Pleading Formalities: Determines whether plaints, written statements, and exhibits must be in Hindi, regional languages, or English.
Key Landmark Precedents:
  • State of Rajasthan v. Basant Nahata, (2005) 12 SCC 77: Discussed official language regulations under Section 137 governing subordinate civil court proceedings.
  • Salem Advocate Bar Association (I) v. Union of India, (2003) 1 SCC 49: Affirmed that language rules under Section 137 are procedural and cannot be used to defeat substantive justice.
Courtroom Practice & Strategic Litigation Guidance:

Verify the State Government's language notification under Section 137; in many states, documents filed in English must be accompanied by certified regional language translations for subordinate court trials.