Section 101: Second appeal on no other grounds

Code of Civil Procedure • Official Statutory Text & Practice Guide

Statutory Regulation
Legal Standard
Competent Court / Tribunal
Act 1908

Legal Commentary & Landmark Judgments: Section 101

Section 101 establishes an absolute statutory prohibition barring any second appeal from being entertained by the High Court except on the grounds specified in Section 100.

  • Exclusive Second Appeal Jurisdiction: No second appeal shall lie except on the grounds provided by Section 100.
  • Bar on Collateral Second Appeals: Prevents litigants from inventing equitable or common law grounds to invoke second appellate jurisdiction.
  • Substantial Question of Law Mandate: Requires an express formulation of a substantial question of law under Section 100 as an indispensable jurisdictional threshold.
Key Landmark Precedents:
  • Nazir Mohamed v. J. Kamala, (2020) 19 SCC 765: The Supreme Court authoritatively analyzed Section 101 and Section 100, holding that Section 101 strictly circumscribes High Court jurisdiction, prohibiting reappreciation of facts or interference with concurrent factual findings.
  • Hero Vinoth v. Seshammal, (2006) 5 SCC 545: The Supreme Court reiterated that under Section 101, the High Court cannot entertain a second appeal on grounds of factual error, howsoever gross, unless it translates into a substantial question of law.
Courtroom Practice & Strategic Litigation Guidance:

In resisting an admitted second appeal, invoke Section 101 to demonstrate that the appellant's grounds target concurrent findings of fact rather than genuine substantial questions of law, warranting dismissal in limine.