Section 13: Refund of fee paid on memorandum of appeal

Court Fees Act • Official Statutory Text & Practice Guide

Statutory Regulation
Legal Standard
Competent Court / Tribunal
Act 1870

Legal Commentary & Landmark Judgments: Section 13

Section 13 of the Court-Fees Act, 1870 mandates the refund of court fees paid on a memorandum of appeal where the appellate court remands the suit for retrial under Order XLI Rule 23 of the CPC.

  • Appellate Remedies & Forum: Section 13 provides that if an appeal or plaint, which has been rejected by the lower court on any of the grounds mentioned in the Code of Civil Procedure, is ordered to be received, or if a suit is remanded in appeal on any of the grounds mentioned in Order XLI Rule 23 CPC for a second decision by the lower court.
  • Judicial Review & Forum: Grant to the appellant a certificate authorizing them to receive back from the Collector the full amount of fee paid on the memorandum of appeal.

This section mandates the full reimbursement of appellate court fees upon remand, ensuring litigants are not financially penalized for retrials necessitated by lower court errors.

Key Landmark Precedents:
  • State of U.P. v. Ramkrishan Burman, AIR 1971 SC 87: The Supreme Court held that Section 13 refund is mandatory when a remand falls strictly within the ambit of Order XLI Rule 23 CPC upon determination of a preliminary point.
  • High Court of Judicature at Madras v. M.C. Subramaniam, (2021) 3 SCC 560: The Supreme Court traced the beneficial refund scheme of the Court-Fees Act, affirming that provisions directing return of fee must be construed broadly to advance justice.
Legal Commentary:

When an appellate court remands a suit under Order XLI Rule 23 CPC, counsel for the appellant must make an immediate oral or written application praying for issuance of a refund certificate under Section 13. The certificate is presented to the District Collector for disbursement of the refunded fee.